The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1845•Sonya McIntyre-Handy v. West Telemarketing Corporation
00-1845Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 19, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1845
SONYA MCINTYRE-HANDY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WEST TELEMARKETING CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District
Judge. (CA-99-100-4)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sonya McIntyre-Handy, Appellant Pro Se. Scott William Kezman,
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, Norfolk, Virginia; Phyllis Pollard, SCOTT,
DOUGLASS & MCCONNICO, L.L.P., Austin, Texas, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sonya McIntyre-Handy appeals the district court’s order grant-
ing summary judgment to the employer in Appellant’s religious dis-
crimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McIntyre-Handy
v. West Telemarketing, No. CA-99-100-4 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.