The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1814•Calvin Lee Smith v. Gilbert F. Jackson
00-1814Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 1, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1814
CALVIN LEE SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GILBERT F. JACKSON; OFFICER JASPER N. WHITE-
HEAD; OFFICER W. J. SANKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-00-124-2)
Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich,
PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Lee Smith appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Smith v. Jackson, No. CA-00-124-2 (E.D. Va.
June 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.