The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1806•Eugene Gray v. United States of America
00-1806Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1806
EUGENE GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA; JOEL SILVERMAN,
Doctor, in his individual and official
capacity,
Defendants.
No. 00-2216
EUGENE GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
U. S. DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY; WILLIAM S.
COHEN, Secretary, Department of Defense,
Defendants - Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-99-255-3, CA-99-838-3)
Submitted: October 31, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beverly D. Crawford, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Kenneth E.
Melson, United States Attorney, Joan E. Evans, Assistant United
States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Gray appeals from the district court’s orders dismiss-
ing his employment discrimination and related civil claims. Our
review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the opinions of the
district court discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Cohen, No.
CA-99-255-3; Gray v. United States Defense Commissary Agency, No.
CA-99-838-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2001 & July 11, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.