The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1784•Stephanie Atchley v. Baptist Hospital
00-1784Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 6, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1784
STEPHANIE ATCHLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BAPTIST HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, and per-
sons of Baptist Hospital and Medical Center;
LEN PRESLAR, Administrator; JOHN WILLIAMS,
Chief of Security; J. T. MOSER, Security;
GEORGE JACOBS, Head of Security; WOMBLE,
CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE AND RICE LAW FIRM; TONY
BRETT, Attorney; KENNETH MOSER, Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-99-1143-1)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 6, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephanie Atchley, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Ford, Demetrius
L. Worley, TUGGLE, DUGGINS & MESCHAN, P.A., Greensboro, North Caro-
lina; William Cranford Raper, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Stephanie Atchley appeals the district court’s order dismiss-
ing her civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim under
Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Atchley
filed a complaint against Baptist Hospital and Medical Center
(“Hospital”), several of its employees, and attorneys representing
the hospital, claiming that she was improperly barred from using
the hospital’s chapel. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Atchley v. Baptist Hosp. No. CA-99-1143-1 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.