The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1749•Deloyise Echols v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CA-00-247-A
00-1749Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 1, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1749
DELOYISE ECHOLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary, Department of the
Army,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-247-A)
Submitted: December 15, 2000 Decided: February 1, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dorrance D. Dickens, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Helen F.
Fahey, United States Attorney, Edward J. Martin, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Deloyise Echols appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his action alleging employment discrimination and denying his
motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Echols v. Caldera,
No. CA-00-247-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.