The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1748•Zeus Enterprises, Incorporated v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CA-97-294
00-1748Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1748
ZEUS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALPHIN AIRCRAFT, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
THURMAN S. ALPHIN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-97-294)
Submitted: March 27, 2001 Decided: April 30, 2001
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William H. Bode, Jacquelyn Gluck, BODE & BECKMAN, L.L.P., Washing-
ton, D.C., for Appellant. Robert E. Greenberg, Thomas F. Murphy,
FRIEDLANDER, MISLER, SLOAN, KLETZKIN & OCHSMAN, P.L.L.C., Washing-
ton, D.C., for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Alphin Aircraft, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order
denying its motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b). Our review of the record included on appeal and the par-
ties’ briefs discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. Zeus Enters., Inc. v.
Alphin Aircraft, Inc., No. CA-97-294 (E.D. Va. May 12, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.