The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1724•Marc S. Smith v. BARDON, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Merit Concrete, Incorporated
00-1724Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 1, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1724
MARC S. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BARDON, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Merit Concrete,
Incorporated,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
99-2436-CCB)
Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marc S. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Norman Robert Buchsbaum, Christo-
pher Mark Feldenzer, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marc S. Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil action against his former employer. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court insofar as it dismissed Smith’s complaint for failure to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b)(6). See Smith v. Bardon, Inc., No. CA-99-2436-CCB
(D. Md. May 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.