The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1717•Charles H. Boone v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security
00-1717Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 11, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1717
CHARLES H. BOONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.
(CA-99-192)
Submitted: September 20, 2000 Decided: October 11, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles H. Boone, Appellant Pro Se. S. Douglas Murray, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John Francis
Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles H. Boone appeals from the district court’s order
granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion for summary
judgment and affirming the denial of social security disability
insurance benefits. We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Boone v. Apfel, No. CA-99-192
(W.D. Va. May 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.