Joe Nesbitt v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security

00-1703Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1703
JOE NESBITT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William G. Connelly, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-99-2217-WMN)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States
Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* The parties consented to have the case tried before a magis-
trate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
2
PER CURIAM:
Joe Nesbitt appeals from the magistrate judge’s order denying
relief on his petition for review of the Social Security Admin-
istration’s decision affirming an administrative law judge’s denial
of Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. *
Our review of the record discloses that the administrative law
judge’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
magistrate judge. See Nesbitt v. Apfel, No. CA-99-2217-WMN (D. Md.
Mar. 30, 2000). Nesbitt’s motion for appointment of counsel is
denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.