The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1629•Todd D. Richey v. U.s. Railroad Retirement Board
00-1629Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1629
TODD D. RICHEY,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Railroad Retirement
Board. (No. 00-AP-0031, WCA-000-00-1446)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd D. Richey, Petitioner Pro Se. Catherine C. Cook, General
Counsel, Karl Theodore Blank, III, Steven Alan Bartholow, Eric Todd
Wooden, UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Chicago, Illinois,
for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Todd D. Richey seeks review of a Railroad Retirement Board
decision affirming the Hearing Officer’s decision to dismiss his
action seeking additional retirement benefits. We have reviewed
the record and the Board’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Richey
v. United States R.R. Retirement Bd., No. 00-AP-0031 (RRB Apr. 14,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.