The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1628•Louis A. Csoka v. United States Government
00-1628Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 1, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1628
LOUIS A. CSOKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; RUDY LOZANO; JAMES
T. MOODY; ALLEN SHARP, and the above Federal
Judges; AMOCO OIL COMPANY, its management--
Richard J. McGillivary, Jack Graham, Ralph
Phillip, Michael VanAcker, Michael A. Doerner,
Eric Weck, Vyt Lazauskas aka BP Amoco; UNKS;
H. NASIF MAHMOUD, Attorney; WILLIAM H. WALDEN,
Deputy Prosecutor/Attorney; CHARLES H. GRAD-
DICK, City Judge/Attorney; JOEL C. LEVY;
STEVEN R. CRIST; PALMER C. SINGLETON, JR.; R.
CORDELL FUNK; NELS KOMPIER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-
873-L)
Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Louis A. Csoka, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Louis A. Csoka appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action and transferring the case to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. Our
review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Csoka’s motions for ap-
pointed counsel, for a directed verdict, for a mandatory injunc-
tion, and to correct omission, and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Csoka v. United States, No. CA-00-873-L (D.
Md. Apr. 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.