The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1567•Elvis Butler v. United States of America
00-1567Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1567
ELVIS BUTLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
PAMELA L. BUTLER,
Plaintiff,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
99-503-CCB)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 27, 2000
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter J. Sommer, Samuel J. Mangione, SOMMER & STEELE, L.L.C., Bal-
timore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States
Attorney, Nadira Clarke, Assistant United States Attorney, Balti-
more, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Elvis Butler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
civil action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint ap-
pendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Butler v. United States, No. CA-99-503-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 10,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.