The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1523•Sherry D. Battle v. Kadosh, Incorporated
00-1523Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 7, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1523
SHERRY D. BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ELITE CHILD, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
versus
KADOSH, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CA-99-857-2)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherry D. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Ira Michael Steingold, STEIN-
GOLD & MENDELSON, Portsmouth, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sherry D. Battle appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing a civil complaint filed by a corporation, Elite Child,
Inc., in which she is the sole shareholder. The notice of appeal
was signed only by Battle, who is not an attorney. It is well
settled that a corporation cannot appear in federal court except
through its attorney. Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S.
194, 201-02 (1993). Accordingly, we grant the Appellee’s motion to
dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.