The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1495•William H. Wyatt, Jr v. S. C. Jones Service, Incorporated
00-1495Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1495
WILLIAM H. WYATT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
S. C. JONES SERVICE, INCORPORATED; TODD
STARTER, individually and in his capacity as
an employee of S. C. Jones Service, Incorpo-
rated; ROBERT BUFORD, individually and in his
capacity as an employee of S. C. Jones Ser-
vice, Incorporated; STEVEN JONES, individually
and in his capacity as President-Owner of S.
C. Jones Service, Incorporated; GARY YORK,
individually and in his capacity as an em-
ployee of S. C. Jones Service, Incorporated;
JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-00-196-3)
Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
William H. Wyatt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William H. Wyatt, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Wyatt v. S. C. Jones Serv., No. CA-00-196-3 (E.D. Va.
Mar. 28, 2000). We deny Wyatt’s motion to remove Judge Payne from
any pending or future suits. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.