Eric C. Hansen v. Caldwell Diving Company, Incorporated

00-1443Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 13, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1443
ERIC C. HANSEN,
Petitioner,
versus
CALDWELL DIVING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; EM-
PLOYER’S INSURANCE OF WAUSAU; UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Division of Longshore
Harbors Workers; BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(BRB-98-1596)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric C. Hansen, Petitioner Pro Se. Stephen Edward Darling, SINKLER
& BOYD, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina; Laura Jessica Stomski,
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Washington, D.C., for
Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eric C. Hansen seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of benefits pursuant to the Longshore & Harbor Workers’ Compensa-
tion Act. 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Hansen
also appeals the Board’s order denying his motion for reconsid-
eration. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s deci-
sions are based upon substantial evidence and are without revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.
Hansen v. Caldwell Diving Co., Inc., No. BRB-98-1596 (Sept. 7, 1999
& Feb. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.