Randall Steven Rogers v. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1435
RANDALL STEVEN ROGERS,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BELL ATLANTIC-VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-99-1445-A)
Submitted: September 26, 2000 Decided: October 11, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karen Rapaport Esser, David James Shaffer, Mary Margaret Utterback,
THELEN, REID & PRIEST, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Randall Steven Rogers, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Bell Atlantic—Virginia, Inc., appeals the district court’s
order denying its motion to dismiss Randall Steven Rogers’ com-
plaint alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1994). We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s reasoning stated in open court and find no re-
versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Rogers v. Bell Atlantic—Virginia, Inc., No.
CA-99-1445-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2000); see also Puryear v. County
of Roanoke, 214 F.3d 514 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --