The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1415•Kingwood Coal Company v. Terry D. Devall
00-1415Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1415
KINGWOOD COAL COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
TERRY D. DEVALL; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPART-
MENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(98-876-BLA)
Submitted: December 29, 2000 Decided: April 30, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William S. Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, P.L.L.C., Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Petitioner. C. Patrick Carrick, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kingwood Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and other affirming the administrative law judge’s
award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945
(West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that
the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is
without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the Board. See Kingwood Coal Company v. Devall, BRB No. 98-876-
BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.