The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1405•Solomon Oladeji Akiode v. U.s. Immigration & Naturalization Service
00-1405Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1405
SOLOMON OLADEJI AKIODE,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A29-846-895)
Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 15, 2000
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beverly Yeskoli, HYDER & GALSTON, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General,
Kristen A. Giuffreda, Anh-Thu P. Mai, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Solomon Oladeji Akiode seeks review of the Board of Immigra-
tion Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order dismissing his appeal
from the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum
and withholding of deportation. Our review of the record discloses
that the Board properly found that Akiode failed to establish a
well-founded fear of persecution. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the Board. See Akiode v. INS, No. A29-846-895 (B.I.A.
Mar. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.