The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1400•Edward F. Hodges v. Richard Epps, Jr
00-1400Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1400
EDWARD F. HODGES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD EPPS, JR.; SAMUEL R. BROWN, II,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-99-788)
Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward F. Hodges, Appellant Pro Se. David Gant Shuford, Laura
Graham Fox, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; William Reilly
Marchant, THORSEN, MARCHANT & SCHER, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward F. Hodges appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint and
post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hodges v. Epps,
No. CA-99-788 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2 & Mar. 7, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.