The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1353•Kingsley Anyanwutaku v. Fleet Mortgage Group, Incorporated
00-1353Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 28, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1353
KINGSLEY ANYANWUTAKU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FLEET MORTGAGE GROUP, INCORPORATED; HOUSEHOLD
MORTGAGE SERVICES; SHAPIRO & BURSON; JOHN S.
BURSON; WILLIAM M. SAVAGE; RON BROWN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-99-1104-AW)
Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 28, 2000
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kingsley Anyanwutaku, Appellant Pro Se. Santiago Ricardo Narvaiz,
LAW OFFICES OF S. RICARDO NARVAIZ, Fairfax, Virginia; Peter Henrik
Gunst, ASTRACHAN, GUNST, GOLDMAN & THOMAS, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kingsley Anyanwutaku appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants in his suit challenging a
foreclosure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Anyanwutaku v. Fleet
Mortgage Group, No. CA-99-1104-AW (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2000). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.