Aretha Chapman v. Richard Danzig, Secretary of the Navy

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1348
ARETHA CHAPMAN; TERESA ELLIOT; HESTIA G.
PAPPAS; CAROLYN BOLLING; ZENA R. PARKER; JOYCE
SHELTON; LISA C. GREGORY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
RICHARD DANZIG, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-99-1494-A)
Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 11, 2000
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Bell, C. Vaughn Adams, BELL & ADAMS, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellants. Arthur Erwin Peabody, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their suit alleging con-
stitutional violations by the Equal Employment Opportunity Office
of the Naval Sea Systems Command. We have reviewed the record and
the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Chapman v.
Danzig, No. CA-99-1494-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --