Jonathan Cobb v. University of Virginia

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1343
JONATHAN COBB; DARRYL COBB; ANNETTE COBB,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA; BOARD OF VISITORS;
HOVEY S. DABNEY; CHARLES CARAVATI; JOHN
ACKERLY, III; CHAMP CLARK; FRANKLIN BIRCKHEAD;
WILLIAM CRUTCHFIELD; WILLIAM GOODWIN; T.
KEISTER GREER; ELSIE GOODWYN HOLLAND; C.
WILSON MCNEELY, III; TERENCE ROSS; ALBERT
SMALL; ELIZABETH TWOHY; HENRY VALENTINE, III;
WALTER WALKER; JAMES WHEAT, III; KRISTINE
LALONDE; ALEXANDER GILLIAM, JR.; WILLIAM HAR-
MON; HONOR COMMITTEE; NICOLE ERAMO; JENNIFER
ERICKSON; APRIL FEARNLEY; D. CABELL VEST;
CLAIR PARRISH; ERIKA WERNER; UNKNOWN MEMBERS
OF INVESTIGATION PANEL I; JENNIFER JONES;
JUSTIN KNEBEL; SCOTT WALKER; KELLY MANN;
ELIZABETH BIBB; DEBEER, First Name Unknown;
UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF INVESTIGATION PANEL II;
UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF REVIEW PANEL; EDMOND COX;
JEFFREY LUDDEN; TIFFANY PANKOW; STEWART
MCCUTCHEN; AARON BOOTH; SCOTT WALKER; UNKNOWN
MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE BOARD; TIMOTHY ROBERTSON;
BENJAMIN WARTHEN; STEWART MCCUTCHEN; AARON
BOOTH; SCOTT WALKER; UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF
EXECUTIVE BOARD; TIMOTHY ROBERTSON; BENJAMIN
WARTHEN; JOSEPH WOLFE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (CA-99-7-3)

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 28, 2000
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Cobb, Darryl Cobb, Annette Cobb, Appellants Pro Se. Mark
L. Earley, Attorney General, Ronald Curtis Forehand, Senior As-
sistant Attorney General, Ashley Lionel Taylor, Jr., Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Patrick B. Kelly, UNIVERSITY
OF VIRGINIA, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Appellants Jonathan Cobb, Darryl Cobb, and Annette Cobb appeal
the district court’s order dismissing Darryl and Annette as
plaintiffs for lack of standing, and Jonathan Cobb appeals the
district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the
Appellees on his civil action alleging violation of his con-
stitutional and state law rights. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cobb
v. University of Va., No. CA-99-7-3 (W.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --