Nathaniel Hunter v. Anna Mae Dickson, sued as Estate of Anna Mae Dickson, MARY K. GIST, sued as Estate…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1266
NATHANIEL HUNTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANNA MAE DICKSON, sued as Estate of Anna Mae
Dickson, MARY K. GIST, sued as Estate of Mary
K. Gist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-99-3-17BD)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 16, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Hunter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Hunter appeals from district court’s orders: (1)
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without
prejudice his action in which he challenges a state court ejectment
proceeding, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. Our
review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hunter v.
Dickson, No. CA-00-99-3-17BD (D.S.C. Feb. 1 & Feb. 14, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --