The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1260•Kanhua Young v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
00-1260Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1260
KANHUA YOUNG; LIHYING YOUNG,
Petitioners - Appellants,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 98-8215)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kanhua Young, Lihying Young, Appellants Pro Se. Janet A. Bradley,
Loretta C. Argrett, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washing-
ton, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kanhua and Lihying Young appeal from the tax court’s orders
determining a deficiency and assessing an accuracy-related penalty
for their 1994 and 1995 income taxes and denying their motions for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s
opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. See Young v. Commis-
sioner, Tax Ct. No. 98-8215 (U.S.T.C. Sept. 15 & 16, 1999; Jan. 11
& Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.