The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1249•Tae M. Kim v. Internal Revenue Service
00-1249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1249
TAE M. KIM; YOUNG J. KIM,
Petitioners - Appellants,
versus
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 15447-97)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tae Kim, Young J. Kim, Appellants Pro Se. Kenneth W. Rosenberg,
Loretta C. Argrett, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washing-
ton, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tae Kim and Young J. Kim appeal from the tax court’s order de-
termining a deficiency with respect to their 1993 and 1994 federal
income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and the tax
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the tax court. See Kim v. Internal Revenue
Service, Tax Ct. No. 15447-97 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 1, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.