The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1245•Daniel Ross v. U.s. Immigration & Naturalization Service
00-1245Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1245
DANIEL ROSS,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A72-473-443)
Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: September 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for
Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General,
Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Marshall Tamor Golding,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Ross seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“Board”) decision and order dismissing his appeal from the immi-
gration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withhold-
ing of deportation. Our review of the record discloses that the
Board properly found that Ross failed to establish a well-founded
fear of persecution. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the Board. See Ross v. INS, No. A72-473-443 (B.I.A. Feb. 7, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.