(CA-98-3091-WMN) Brian P. Nichols v. Comast Cablevision of Maryland

Filed: July 26, 2000
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1206
(CA-98-3091-WMN)
Brian P. Nichols,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
Comast Cablevision of Maryland,
Defendant - Appellee.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed June 21, 2000, as follows:
On the cover sheet, section 3, line 2 -- the lower court judge
is corrected to read “Beth P. Gesner, Magisrate Judge.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk

-- 1 of 3 --

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1206
BRIAN P. NICHOLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMCAST CABLEVISION OF MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-
3091-WMN)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 21, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian P. Nichols, Appellant Pro Se. Ned Sanford Kodeck, Ari Jason
Kodeck, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Brian P. Nichols appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to the Defendant in his employment discrimination
action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Nichols v. Comcast Cablevi-
sion, No. CA-98-3091-WMN (D. Md. Jan. 19, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --