Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1183
KAMRAN TAVAKOLI-NOURI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, a/k/a
Amtrak; MICHAEL BIBLEHIMER; MARILYN C.
BROOKHARDT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99-
3632-AMD)
Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2000
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McHugh Lambert,
Stuart Schad, HODES, ULMAN, PESSIN & KATZ, P.A., Towson, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider an earlier order denying a motion
to remand. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because
the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337
U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order
nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --