The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1166•Ralph Louis Vitale, Jr v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
00-1166Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 21, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1166
RALPH LOUIS VITALE, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 97-346)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 21, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph Louis Vitale, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David I. Pincus, Alice
Lizbeth Ronk, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ralph Louis Vitale, Jr., appeals from the tax court’s order
determining a deficiency in his 1993 and 1994 income taxes. We
have reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinion and orders and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the tax court. See Vitale v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 97-346
(U.S. Tax Ct. Apr. 21, July 19, & Oct. 27, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.