The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1123•Works Council (betriebsvertretung) 86 Ceg v. United States Department of the Air Force
00-1123Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 8, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1123
WORKS COUNCIL (BETRIEBSVERTRETUNG) 86 CEG;
FRITZ FRANK; BERND GUCKENBIEHL; MANFRED KRAUS;
KURT MATHEIS; HORST-WALTER NEU; WOLFGANG
SIEGFRIED; KARL-HEINZ STASS; R&W FLAMMANN
GMBH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; DR.
JAMES G. ROCHE, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WORLD SERVICE ALLIANCE, GMBH,
Intervenor/Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-99-1522-A)
Argued: September 23, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
ARGUED: David Samuel Panzer, GREENBERG TRAURIG, L.L.P., Washington,
D.C., for Appellants. Steven E. Gordon, Assistant United States
Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Jon W.
Van Horne, Eric C. Rowe, Geoffrey J. Greeves, GREENBERG TRAURIG,
L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Mark David Maxwell,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
We have considered the record and the briefs and, upon oral
argument, are of opinion there is no reversible error in this case.
The judgment of the district court is accordingly
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.