The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1080•Nathan J. Power v. Lear Siegler Services, Incorporated
00-1080Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1080
NATHAN J. POWER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
UNC-LEAR SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-98-2752-18-2)
Submitted: July 14, 2000 Decided: July 27, 2000
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
A. Christopher Potts, HITCHCOCK & POTTS, Charleston, South Caro-
lina, for Appellant. Jonathan S. Harbuck, THE KULLMAN FIRM,
Birmingham, Alabama; H. Brewton Hagood, ROSEN, GOODSTEIN & HAGOOD,
P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Nathan J. Power appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to his former employer in this wrongful termination
action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Power v. Lear Siegler Servs.
Inc., No. CA-98-2752-18-2 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.