John E. Paskoski v. Ceres Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1015
JOHN E. PASKOSKI,
Petitioner,
versus
CERES CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(99-0197)
Submitted: June 27, 2000 Decided: July 10, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald F. Gay, ARNOLD & GAY, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Peti-
tioner. Lawrence P. Postol, SEAFORTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALD-
SON, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John E. Paskoski seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of longshore benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 (West 1994
& Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the admin-
istrative law judge properly weighed all relevant evidence upon
remand and that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evi-
dence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the Board. See Paskoski v. Ceres Corp., BRB No.
99-0197 (B.R.B. Nov. 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --