In re: Magus Ahnend

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-1734

In re: MAGUS JAMYE REFICUL AHNEND,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. (5:26-cv-00291)

Submitted: July 16, 2026 Decided: July 21, 2026

Before WILKINSON, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Magus Jamye Reficul Ahnend, Petition Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Magus Jamye Reficul Ahnend petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his objections to the magistrate judge’s
proposed findings and recommendation in Ahnend’s civil case. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay
in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED