The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
181693po-pdf•UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D. v. Upmc
181693po-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitSep 17, 2019
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_______________
No. 18-1693
_______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D.;
ROBERT J. SCLABASSI, M.D.; ANNA MITINA
v.
UPMC; UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS,
d/b/a UPP DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSURGERY
J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D.;
ROBERT J. SCLABASSI, M.D.; ANNA MITINA,
Appellants
_______________
(W.D. Pa. No. 2:12-cv-00145)
_______________
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
_______________
Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, and McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN,
HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO,
BIBAS, MATEY, PHIPPS, and FUENTES,* Circuit Judges
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellees in the above-captioned case having been
submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other
available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, it is hereby ORDERED that
the petition for rehearing is GRANTED IN PART. A majority of the judges who partici-
pated in the decision of the Court having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by
* Judge FUENTES’s vote is limited to panel rehearing only.
-- 1 of 2 --
the panel is GRANTED. The opinion and judgment filed September 17, 2019, are hereby
VACATED. A subsequent opinion and judgment are herewith issued.
The majority has made changes to the language that appeared at pages 3–4, 6, 11, 15,
27–30, 32–33, 35–37, and 39–40 of the original opinion. Most of the material that appeared
at pages 18–25 of the original opinion has been deleted. Judge AMBRO’s opinion concur-
ring in the judgment has been withdrawn.
A majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing,
the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc is DENIED.
By the Court,
s/ Stephanos Bibas
Circuit Judge
Dated: December 20, 2019
NMR/cc: Patrick K. Cavanaugh, Esq.
Stephen J. Del Sole, Esq.
Gregory M. Simpson, Esq.
Andrew M. Stone, Esq.
Kirti Datla, Esq.
Jessica L. Ellsworth, Esq.
Sarah C. Marberg, Esq.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.