The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
171056po-pdf•Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States of America
171056po-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitSep 6, 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
September 19, 2017
No. 17-1056
JOSHIM UDDIN,
Petitioner
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent
(Agency No. 208-059-346)
Present: GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ and RENDELL, Circuit Judges
1. Motion by Respondent to Amend Opinion dated September 6, 2017.
Respectfully,
Clerk/tmm
_________________________________ORDER________________________________
The foregoing motion is granted.
The opinion at page 20, first paragraph, last sentence which reads:
“As long as the agency finds as a matter of fact that the allegedly terroristic acts were
authorized by party leaders, we review that determination for clear error.” is amended
to read instead:
“As long as the agency finds as a matter of fact that the allegedly terroristic acts were
authorized by party leaders, we will accept that finding if supported by substantial
evidence.”
An amended opinion will be issued. As this change does not alter the Court's
disposition, judgment entered by the Court will not be amended.
-- 1 of 2 --
By the Court,
s/MARJORIE O. RENDELL
Circuit Judge
Dated: September 25, 2017
tmm/cc: Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, Esq.
Daniel I. Smulow, Esq.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.