The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
162749np-pdf•Third Circuit disposition — 162749np-pdf
162749np-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitMar 16, 2017
RESUBMIT HLD-003 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 16-2749
___________
IN RE: ALTON D. BROWN,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3-14-cv-01180)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
February 13, 2017
Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: March 16, 2017)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Alton D. Brown filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the
District Court to rule on a request for an opportunity to appeal the District Court’s
dismissal order in Brown v. Lancaster, M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3:14-cv-01180. The District
Court has since ruled on Brown’s filing. In light of the District Court’s action, the
question Brown presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will dismiss his
* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d
Cir. 1992).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.