The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
161650po-pdf•Richard Fields v. City of Philadelphia
161650po-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitJul 13, 2017
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
________________
No. 16-1650
________________
RICHARD FIELDS,
Appellant
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; SISCA,
POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 9547;
JOE DOE, AN UNKNOWN PHILADELPHIA
POLICE OFFICER
________________
No. 16-1651
________________
AMANDA GERACI,
Appellant
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DAWN BROWN,
POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2454;
TERRA M. BARROW, POLICE OFFICER,
BADGE NO. 1147; NIKKI L. JONES,
POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2549;
RHONDA SMITH, POLICE OFFICER,
BADGE NO. 1373
________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action Nos. 2-14-cv-04424/05264)
District Judge: Honorable Mark A. Kearney
________________
-- 1 of 2 --
Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The Court has been made aware of a typographical error in the opinion entered on July 7,
2017. Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that sentence on page 19, paragraph 1, line 11 of
the opinion should read:
Notably, the plaintiff in Fordyce [v. City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436 (9th Cir.
1995)] claimed he was recording a public protest for a local news station.”); …
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: July 13, 2017
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.