Phillip Lee Fantone v. FRED LATINI, JOE BURGER, and RON MACKEY

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
______________
No. 13-3611
________________
PHILLIP LEE FANTONE,
Appellant
v.
FRED LATINI, JOE BURGER, and RON MACKEY
________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civ. No. 2-12-cv-01691)
Honorable Cynthia R. Eddy, Magistrate Judge
________________
BEFORE: VANASKIE, GREENBERG, and
COWEN, Circuit Judges
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The opinion filed February 18, 2015 is hereby amended as follows:
The sentence starting at the bottom of page 18 and continuing to the top of page 19 is
amended to read as follows:
The Supreme Court explained in Haines that a pro se complaint, “however
inartfully pleaded,” must be held to “less stringent standards than formal
pleadings drafted by lawyers,” id. at 520-21, 92 S.Ct. at 596, but we
nonetheless review the pleading to ensure that it has “sufficient factual
matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its
face.” Ashcroft v Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).
Following this sentence the first letter in the first word of the citation. i.e. see, to Erickson
v. Pardus shall be capitalized.

-- 1 of 2 --

This amendment does not alter the prior disposition of the Court and the judgment
entered on February 18, 2015 shall not be amended.
By the Court,
s/ Morton I. Greenberg
Circuit Judge
Dated: March 24, 2015
SLC/cc: Tarah E. Ackerman, Esq.
Thomas S. Jones, Esq.
Peter D. Laun, Esq.
Kemal A. Mericli, Esq.

-- 2 of 2 --