The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
123343npo-pdf•Minikan Wreth Johnson v. Attorney General of the United States of America
123343npo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitJun 16, 2015
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
February 3, 2015
No. 12-3343
MINIKAN WRETH JOHNSON,
Petitioner
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent
(Agency No. 079-925-413)
Present: HARDIMAN, SCIRICA and ROTH, Circuit Judges
1. Motion by Respondent to Clarify or Amend Decision of December 17, 2014.
2. Response in Opposition by Petitioner to Motion to Clarify or Amend Decision
of December 17, 2014.
Respectfully,
Clerk/tmm
_________________________________ORDER________________________________
The foregoing motion to clarify or amend the decision of December 17, 2014 is granted.
Upon further review, the Court will issue an amended opinion. The amended opinion
does not affect the entry of judgment.
By the Court,
s/Anthony J. Scirica
Circuit Judge
Dated: June 16, 2015
tmm/cc: Herbert C. Shelley, Esq.
Jessica L. Urban, Esq.
Jeffrey Bernstein, Esq.
Margaret A. O’Donnell, Esq.
Ann C. Varnon, Esq.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.