Michael R. Shemonsky v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Amended per Clerk’s

HLD-091 (February 2010) NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-4572
___________
MICHAEL R. SHEMONSKY,
Appellant
v.
*FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
*(Amended per Clerk’s Order dated 2/1/10)
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(E.D. Pa. Civil No. 93-cv-00004)
District Judge: Honorable Paul S. Diamond
____________________________________
Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant to
Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6
February 25, 2010
Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges
Opinion filed: March 9, 2010
___________
OPINION
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Shemonsky appeals pro se from the District Court’s November 19,
2009 order. We will summarily affirm.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
In February 1993, the District Court ordered that Shemonsky be
permanently enjoined from filing in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania any further
pleadings or documents relating to this case without prior approval of the court. In
November 2009, Shemonsky submitted a “Motion to Transfer to the Bankruptcy Court.”
The District noted that the motion was “almost incomprehensible and plainly frivolous,”
and did not allow Shemonsky to file the motion because he did not first seek the court’s
permission. His appeal from the 1993 order was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and
we affirmed the subsequent dismissal of a 60(b) motion that he filed in violation of that
order. See Shemonsky v. Resolution Trust Corp., 132 Fed. Appx. 424 (3d Cir. 2005).
The District Court’s refusal to file Shemonsky’s motion was proper.
Because no “substantial question” is presented by this appeal, we will affirm the order of
the District Court.

-- 2 of 2 --