The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
083361po1-pdf•and 08-3759 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Tamika Riley and Sharpe James
083361po1-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitOct 21, 2010
Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge of the United States Court of*
International Trade, sitting by designation.
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________________
Nos. 08-3361, 08-3413, 08-3758, and 08-3759
___________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee and Cross-Appellant
v.
TAMIKA RILEY AND SHARPE JAMES
Appellants and Cross-Appellees
___________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. No. 2-07-cr-00578)
District Judge: Honorable William J. Martini
___________________
Argued April 13, 2010
Before: SLOVITER and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge*
ORDER AMENDING OCTOBER 21, 2010
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order amending opinion in the above
case, filed October 21, 2010, be amended as follows:
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Page 15, first sentence of the first full paragraph which read:
While it is true that the jury convicted James of a substantive violation
referred to in one of the alternative descriptions of duty, 18 U.S.C. § 666
(Count 4), dependents have met their burden of showing a reasonable
probability that the jury utilized the broad definition of an honest services
violation given in connection with the entire conspiracy charge.
shall read:
While it is true that the jury convicted James of a substantive violation
referred to in one of the alternative descriptions of duty, 18 U.S.C. § 666
(Count 4), defendants have met their burden of showing a reasonable
probability that the jury utilized the broad definition of an honest services
violation given in connection with the entire conspiracy charge.
BY THE COURT,
/s/ Jane A. Restani
Judge
DATED: October 27, 2010
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.