Third Circuit disposition — 073939npo-pdf

073939npo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitFeb 5, 2009

Full text

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
January 23, 2009
No. 07-3939
United States of America
vs.
John Mangan, Appellant
(District of New Jersey Criminal No. 07-cr-00136)
PRESENT: McKEE, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges.
1. Motion by Appellee to clarify the Opinion.
Answer due 2/3/09 Tonya Wyche 267-299-4938
Argued 12/10/08 Case Manager
O R D E R
The foregoing Motion by Appellee to Clarify the Opinion is construed as a Motion to Amend the
Opinion. The Motion to Amend the Opinion is GRANTED and the Opinion filed on January 8, 2009 is
amended as set forth below.
The first complete sentence on page six of the opinion accessed at www.ca3.uscourts.gov,
which states: “In our view, it is the District Court that must determine, albeit with the
advice or opinion of a mental health professional, the type and duration of mental health
treatment” is AMENDED by eliminating the clause “albeit with the advice or opinion of a
mental health professional”. As amended, the sentence shall state: “In our view, it is the
District Court that must determine the type and duration of mental health treatment.”
By the Court,
/s/ D. Brooks Smith
Circuit Judge
Dated: February 5, 2009
tyw/cc: James F. Gizzi, Esq.
George S. Leone, Esq.
Steven G. Sanders, Esq.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.