Carolyn R. Allen-Mensah v. Fbi Agent O’malley

ALD-103 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 06-3387
________________
CAROLYN R. ALLEN-MENSAH,
Appellant
v.
FBI AGENT O’MALLEY, AND INVOLVED FBI AGENTS, ET AL.
____________________________________
On Appeal From the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civ. No. 06-cv-02362)
District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III
_______________________________________
Submitted For Possible Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action
Under Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6
January 19, 2007
BEFORE: SLOVITER, CHAGARES and NYGAARD, CIRCUIT JUDGES
(Filed:February 2, 2007 )
_______________________
OPINION
_______________________
PER CURIAM
In June 2006, pro se appellant Carolyn R. Allen-Mensah filed a complaint in the
District Court alleging, inter alia, that FBI agents conducted “illegal guinea pig

-- 1 of 2 --

2
experiments on my sons and me” and “had psychotic pilots use electrical force on my
sons to make them commit” crimes and “involuntary sex acts.” Allen-Mensah seeks
“immediate release and return of [her] son” and “removal of the electric weapons from
[her] body.” The District Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. Allen-Mensah timely appealed and appellee has filed a
motion for summary action.
This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. As there is no question that
Allen-Mensah’s claims involve fantastic factual scenarios and that the complaint lacks
any arguable factual or legal basis, see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28 (1989),
we will grant the appellee’s motion to summarily affirm the District Court’s dismissal of
the complaint. See 3d Cir. LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6.

-- 2 of 2 --