The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
043709npo1-pdf•04-4647 RAFIQ AMJAD and ASTER AMJAD v. Attorney General of the United States
043709npo1-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitNov 29, 2005
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 04-3709, 04-4647
RAFIQ AMJAD and ASTER AMJAD,
Petitioners
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,
Respondent
Petition for Review of the Order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(A95 467 602, A95 467 603)
Argued October 24, 2005
Before: SLOVITER, FISHER, Circuit Judges,
and THOMPSON, District Judge*
ORDER AMENDING NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION
Upon consideration of the petition for panel rehearing, the Court has
decided to amend the not precedential opinion filed November 29, 2005 in the following
respect:
* Hon. Anne E. Thompson, United States District Judge for the District of New
Jersey, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Page 9, line 11 - delete the sentence beginning “Rather than decide this case
on the Amjads’ knowledge . . .” and substitute “After careful consideration of the record,
we cannot conclude that the IJ’s adverse credibility determination lacks substantial
evidence support. Moreover, we note that there is a striking deficiency in petitioners’
case – the lack of evidence that the Pakistani government was responsible for the
incidents on which they base their claim of persecution.” Continue with the sentence
“We repeat that portion . . . .”
By the Court,
/s/ Dolores K. Sloviter
Circuit Judge
Dated: February 14, 2006
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.