The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
041876po2-pdf•Bruce J. Wilderman, D.d.s.; Heidy D. Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully, P.c
041876po2-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitOct 28, 2005
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 04-1876
BRUCE J. WILDERMAN, D.D.S.;
HEIDY D. WILDERMAN,
Appellants
v.
COOPER & SCULLY, P.C.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action No. 04-cv-00460)
District Judge: Honorable Stewart Dalzell
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
September 30, 2005
Before: ALITO, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges
RESTANI,* Chief Judge
(Opinion filed October 28, 2005)
ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION
* Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International
Trade, sitting by designation.
AMBRO, Circuit Judge
-- 1 of 2 --
2
IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed
October 28, 2005, be amended as follows:
On page 3, note 1, line 12, replace the word “the” with “. . .”.
On page 6, first full paragraph beginning “On the other hand”, line 4,
replace the word “finding” with the word “holding”.
On page 6, first full paragraph beginning “On the other hand”, line 9,
replace the word “finding” with the word “holding”.
On page 7, last paragraph, second line, after the word “appealable” and
before the quote starting “‘based upon ...’”, insert the phrase “because it was”.
By the Court,
/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge
Dated: December 23, 2005
CMH/cc: RMG, REM, SJP, GWB, KK, GW
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.