The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
041821npo-pdf•Nos: 04-1821/3422 MASH ENTERPRISES, INC, f/k/a HUMAN RESOURCE OPTIONS, INC. v. Prolease Atlantic Corporation
041821npo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitDec 29, 2005
The language for this Order was drafted by Judge Rosenn, the author of the*
Opinion, before he died. However, the Order was not filed until after Judge Rosenn’s
death.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos: 04-1821/3422
MASH ENTERPRISES, INC, f/k/a HUMAN RESOURCE OPTIONS,
INC.; PROFESSIONAL LEASING CONCEPTS, INC.
v.
PROLEASE ATLANTIC CORPORATION; PROFESSIONAL STAFF LEASING
CORPORATION; BALAJI RAMAMOORTHY, a/k/a Bala Ram; REBECCA
RAMAMOORTHY, a/k/a Becky Ram; ASPI IRANI; ALBERT HAWK;
CHARLES EHRIG
v.
HOWARD VOGEL; MARK FRIED, Counter Defendants
Mash Enterprises, Inc., f/k/a Human Resources Options, Inc.,
Howard Vogel, and Mark Fried,
Appellants
Present: Sloviter, McKee & Rosenn , Circuit Judges*
ORDER
AND NOW, upon consideration of the Petition for Panel Rehearing filed in this
case, it is hereby ORDERED that page lines 3-5 on page 15 of the Opinion dated
December 29, 2005, are hereby amended to read as follows: “After the set-offs, the most
ProLease Atlantic could owe to MASH is about $325,884 plus interest at the rate
-- 1 of 2 --
specified by the contract. This represents only about 17% of what MASH claimed was
still due under the contract.”
By the Court,
/s/ Theodore A. McKee
DATED: February 9, 2006
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.