The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
033068np-pdf•United States of America v. Robinson Guzman
033068np-pdfUnited States Court Of Appeals For The 3rd CircuitApr 21, 2005
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 03-3068
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ROBINSON GUZMAN,
Appellant
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
(Dist Court No. 02-CR-00761)
District Court Judge: Hon. John C. Lifland
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
November 1, 2004
Before: ALITO, BARRY, and FUENTES Circuit Judges.
(Filed: April 21, 2005)
OPINION OF THE COURT
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
After pleading guilty pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant in this case was
sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines. The sentencing occurred prior to the
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ___ 125 S. Ct. 738
(2005). Defense counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and has moved to withdraw. Our review of the record has disclosed only one
non-frivolous issue that could be raised on appeal, namely, that the District Court erred in
sentencing the defendant under the erroneous belief that the Sentencing Guidelines were
mandatory rather than advisory. Moreover, having determined that issues with respect to
Booker are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we vacate the
sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with that opinion.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.