The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-4239•Michael J. Ahern v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY On Appeal from the United States District Court for…
02-4239Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitApr 23, 2003
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 02-4239
MICHAEL J. AHERN,
Appellant
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. Civ. No. 01-03527)
Honorable John W. Bissell, Chief Judge
Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
April 8, 2003
BEFORE: ALITO, FUENTES, and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges
(Filed: April 23, 2003)
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
This matter comes on before this court on appeal from an order for judgment
entered on September 19, 2002, in this action in which the district court affirmed the
denial by an administrative law judge of appellant Michael J. Ahern’s request for disability
-- 1 of 2 --
2
insurance under Title II of the Social Security Act. On this appeal we exercise plenary
review over the decision of the district court, see Knepp v. Apfel, 204 F.3d 78, 83 (3d Cir.
2000), but we uphold the administrative decision if supported by substantial evidence. See
Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 390, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1422 (1971). On this appeal
Ahern contends that we should reverse because the administrative law judge’s “conclusion
that [he] did not suffer a severe impairment prior to his date last insured is directly
contradicted by medical expert testimony.” Br. of appellant at 4.
Chief Judge Bissell fully set forth the background of this matter in his opinion and
in the circumstances we see no need to repeat it. Exercising the appropriate standards of
review we find no basis to disturb the order of the district court. Consequently the order of
September 19, 2002, will be affirmed.
TO THE CLERK:
Please file the foregoing not precedential opinion.
/s/ Morton I. Greenberg
Circuit Judge
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.