The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-3740•Anneke Freeman v. MARK H. MURRAY, Trooper w/PA State Police
01-3740Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitJun 18, 2002
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No: 01-3740
ANNEKE FREEMAN,
Appellant
v.
MARK H. MURRAY, Trooper w/PA State Police;
HARRIET L. EARNEST, CPA;
MARSCH-KELLOGG AMERICAN LEGION POST;
COUNTY OF PIKE
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
D.C. Civil No. 99-cv-02179
District Judge: Hon. James M. Munley
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
June 11, 2002
Before: SLOVITER, ROTH & McKEE, Circuit Judges
OPINION OF THE COURT
(Filed June 18, 2002)
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Anneke Freeman, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment
in favor of each of the defendants and against plaintiff Freeman in the civil rights action
she filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983. We will affirm.
Inasmuch as we write only for the parties, we need not recite the factual or
procedural background of this dispute. We have reviewed the thorough and thoughtful
Memorandum which the district court filed on August 30, 2001. We believe that that
Memorandum adequately addresses all of the issues plaintiff has presented on appeal,
and little can be gained by attempting to add to the discussion the district court has
already set forth explaining the reasons for granting defendants’ motions for summary
judgment. Accordingly, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the
district court’s Memorandum of August 30, 2001.
TO THE CLERK:
Please file the foregoing opinion.
By the court,
/s/ Theodore A. McKee
Circuit Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.