The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
001368re-pdf•and 00-1473 LEPAGE’S INCORPORATED; LEPAGE’S MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC v. 3m (minnesota Mining
001368re-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitJan 14, 2002
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 00-1368 and 00-1473
LEPAGE’S INCORPORATED;
LEPAGE’S MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC,
Appellees/ Cross-Appellants
v.
3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY);
KROLL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company,
Appellant
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civ. No. 97-03983)
District Judge: The Honorable John R. Padova
Argued July 12, 2001
BEFORE: SLOVITER, ALITO, and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges
(Opinion Filed: January 14, 2002)
Present: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN,
SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, McKEE, AMBRO
FUENTES, and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.
________________________
O R D E R
__________________________
A majority of the active judges, who are not recused, having voted for rehearing
en banc in the above appeal, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court vacate the
opinion and judgment filed January 14, 2002, and list the above for rehearing en banc at
the convenience of the Court.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward R. Becker
Chief Judge
DATED: February 25, 2002
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.